Inspired by the wonderfulness of Under The Dome, I decided to follow up with The Stand. Partly cos I vaguely remembered the TV version, more importantly I remembered thinking it was good despite having a typical Stephen King Devil stylee baddie, and partly because at the end of UTD there was a big 'if you liked that you'll love this' advert for The Stand. So - I took a chance.
Am I glad I did? Well - I don't think it was time wasted. I chomped through the book at a slightly lower pace than I took UTD certainly - couple of hundred pages tops a day, most days - but it was still a consistent and hefty progress. I just wouldn't have stuck with it if it didn't have......something. As with Under The Dome I kept a brief 'update' blog at http://faceofboe.tumblr.com as I read.
Things The Stand did have - tension, intrigue, readibility, some sympathetic characters, the 'oh fuck' factor and lots of scaryness.
Things The Stand didn't have - pace, logical narrative, enough sympathetic characters, a satisying resolution, humour. It also didn't have a sufficient focus on the actual, you know, Stand that was being made against the forces of evil in the form of Randall Flagg.
Had Stephen King called the book something like 'Survivors US style - scarier and more devilish' or 'The Plague and its Aftermath' or something like that it would have been a fairer representation of what the book was actually, you know, about. If we draw a veil over the fact that anyone who has seen survivors (either version) and is British has seen a better depiction of what a post plague society would probably be like here in the UK, we are still left with the problem of the stand itself. King spent so much time scaring the reader and the protagonists shitless over Flagg, that it seems very unsatisfying that the questers who make it to Vegas don't actually even get to make any sort of stand against him. Not that I wanted to read about Larry and Rslph being torn apart limb from limb obviously - but to have Flagg's power destroyed by Trashy and an A bomb after all that .......it just seems very flat.
I realise that maybe Stephen King's point was that just as for evil to flourish all it takes is for good men to do nothing, maybe for evil to be defeated all it takes is for them to do anything. If that was the case, then it wouldn't matter what they did so long as they set out for Vegas. They were prepared to do something, so that was all that matters? But I don't buy that. Trashy's actions were entirely independent of the people from the free zone. He did his thing because he was mad already. The seeds of Flagg's destruction were sown the minute he accepted Trashy into his society. And that had nothing to do with the acts of good men or women - it had nothing to do with the judge, or Dayna, or M-O-O-N spells Tom Cullen, or Glen or Ralph or Larry or Stu.
Ultimately, with a book that weighs in at over 1300 pages long, call me oldfashioned but I'd have thought a little more room could have been found in there to provide more focus on the actual, you know, Stand, rather than devoting so much time to the preamble. There's a limit to how much back story any narrative really needs. The Stand went way beyond that.
There were too many other loose ends, as well - what was going on with Leo/Joe? What was going on with the rest of the WORLD? Still - despite everything is was an enjoyable read. Just, you know, maybe 500 pages too long, and too broadly focussed. The Stand makes an interesting comparator for Under The Dome but I know which one I preferred.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
Thank you
3 months ago

